• English
  • Español
  • APICSA
  • FUNVECA
Cart 0,00€
Behavioral Psychology
  • Home
  • Journal
    • Last issue
    • All articles
    • Suscriptions
    • Editorial Board
    • Accepted articles
  • Authors
    • Payment for each article
    • Submit your manuscript
    • Guidelines for authors
  • Contact
  • APICSA
  • FUNVECA
Home / Issue Article / Participants’ preferences regarding three computer-based exposure treatments for fear of flying

Participants’ preferences regarding three computer-based exposure treatments for fear of flying

Juana Bretón-López, Miquel Tortella-Feliu, Antonio Riera del Amo, Rosa Baños, Jordi Llabrés, Joan M. Gelabert, and Cristina Botella

This study analyses participants’ preferences regarding three computer-aided exposure treatments for fear of flying (FF): virtual reality exposure treatment assisted by a therapist (VRET), computer-aided exposure with a therapist present throughout exposure sessions (CAE-T), and self-administered computer-aided exposure (CAE-SA). Sixty participants with FF were randomly assigned to one of these treatments. At the end of a treatment, a demonstration of the other two treatment options was given and patients were asked to rate their preferences. At post-treatment, assessment data on treatment preferences were obtained from 48 participants (CAE-T n= 14; CAE-SA n= 16, and VRET n= 18). Participants favoured VRET as the most effective, the most recommended, but also they valued it as the most aversive. Attending to the specific treatment condition received by the participants, results showed that in VRET and CAE-T, participants assessed their own treatment as more preferred, more efficacious and more recommendable. Results suggest relevant features regarding the efficiency of computer-based treatments, and offer insights into improving computer-aided psychological interventions.

Download Abstract
  • Volumen 23 - Issue 2
  • 01/09/2015
  • pp. 265-285

La revista está indexada en las siguientes bases de datos:

ISSN: 1132-9483 | eISSN: 3045-591X
SCImago Journal & Country Rank

SJR 2017: 0.44
Clinical Psychology

Apa

JCR 2019: 1,017
5 años: 1,285
Clinical Psychology

  • Apa
  • Qualis
  • Embase
  • Scopus
  • Ebsco
  • Latindex
  • Psicodoc
  • Cengage
  • Proquest
  • Ibecs
  • Fecyt
Behavioral Psychology / Psicología Conductual © 2025
  • Cookies Policy
  • Privacy policy
  • Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
icon-view icon-download icon-arrow-left icon-pages icon-logo icon-cart icon-twitter icon-facebook